|
Theme |
Contents
| A
Chapter |
Bibliography
|
Where to
Buy
| Author
 Beyond
Forever
investigates, presents and documents persuasive evidence confirming
Charles Darwin had cause for concern when he fretted about “Flaws”
and “Holes” in his theory. .
Spontaneous generation of first life-from non-life is nothing more nor
less than imaginative mythology---it never happened, even in a
laboratory.
Complex life appeared suddenly in the fossil record without evidence of
prior, transitional ancestry.
Darwin
observed different sizes and shapes of finch beaks while visiting the Galapagos islands, but finches continue as finches, never
evolving into some other new and different life kind thanks to genetic
codes, inherent from the beginning.
Stasis, rather than evolution to something new and different, is a
significant feature of the fossil record; life forms continue virtually
unchanged in the fossil record for what conventional dating sees as
millions of years.
Decline predicted by the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
contributes to devolution, not evolution, of existing life forms.
Living organisms are irreducibly complex. As Michael Behe
suggests, remove a single part from a mousetrap and it couldn’t
function.
It troubled Darwin that the nineteenth century fossil
record lacked the chains of transitional life forms essential to prove
his conjecture. Billions of fossil later, discontinuity continues.
Change in any life format is limited to the information present in its
DNA. Mutations don’t add new information but
tend to corrupt the genetic code and the quality of life.
Natural selection functions to screen out the bad rather than serving as
the evolutionary engine leading to something new, different and
improved.
Evolutionism has yet to prove Darwin’s conjecture that
humans descended from a fish via some “hermaphrodite” ancestor---or a
critter with long ears and a tail.
Human brains did not evolve from some unintelligent source.
Concocted evidence such as the infamous “Piltdown Man” fails to validate
unproven hypothesis.
Evolutionism’s resort to random chance accident as the explanation for
life, conflicts with sciences such as chemistry, physics, and
mathematics which display Intelligent Design.
Wernher von Braun is said to have observed,
“I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not
acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence
of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the
advances of science.”
Life did not design itself. Planet Earth, with all its animal and plant
life, is the result of the creative genius of the God of the universe. |
